Rehabilitation The criminal justice system comprises many distinct stages, including arrest, prosecution, trial, sentencing, and punishment, quite often in the form of imprisonment. As will become clear, it is in the last two of these many stages that the debate over rehabilitation and retribution is of special significance.
Inthe United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is a pledge among nations to promote fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.
The political elite in Europe often condemn the US as human rights violators since we still use the death penalty on murderers, which they insist is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
But they couldn't be more wrong. Abolitionists interpret from Article 3 in that Declaration to proclaim each person's right to protection from deprivation of life, especially murderers!
And they also point to Article 5, which states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment.
|Add new comment||Juvenile Justice Most of the approximately 2, individuals sentenced manditorily as juveniles to life without the possibility of parole now have a chance for release in the wake of recent Supreme Court decisions.|
|Punishment vs. Rehabilitation within the criminal justice system Essay Example for Free||The following are research examples found in Social Work Abstracts, an NASW publication which culls behavioral and social science literature. The following references were taken from the first abstracts, which date from to|
|MLA Formatting and Style Guide||It stated inter alia:|
|Death Penalty Links||Keckler, University of New Mexico, finding a clear deterrent in the death penalty for those who murder and do not fear prison.|
From this, abolitinists self-righteously declare that the death penalty violates both of these rights. But in fact, nowhere in that declaration is the DP specifically condemned as a human rights violation!
For instance, in Article 3 it states: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Strangely, from this, abolitionists interpret that the death penalty is a human rights violation since it deprives a person's right to life. But if we were to follow that reasoning, we would have to abolish prisons as a human rights violation as well since they deprive people of liberty.
We would also have to abolish charging taxes and fines since they violate one's "security of person. So the interpretation that abolitionists Punishment vs rehabilitation research paper from Article 3 of the Declaration is illogical and contradictory.
And in Article 5, it states: No one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. From this, abolitionists insist that capital punishment is ruled out because it is "the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment.
Indeed, Punishment vs rehabilitation research paper is stated in Article 5 is highly subjective and open to interpretation and could just as easily be applied to prisons as well. And at the time it was implemented, most nations who signed it had the had the death penalty and continued to use it long after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was approved by them.
So obviously, the signers back then had the moral coherence to appreciate the distinction between murders and executions. What the DP is, is a punishment for a human rights violation, not a human rights violation itself.
Anyone with any amount of moral judgment and coherence would recognize and respect that difference. All abolitionists are trying to do is protect human rights violators at the expense of their victims by trying to pass off the just punishment of human rights violations as a human rights violation itself, an analysis that one would have to be totally lacking in sound moral judgement to accept since it is so obviously contradictory as well as morally and logically skewed.
European elites enjoy showcasing their opposition to the death penalty as a progressive policy based on the respect of human rights. However, the moral basis of European opposition to the death penalty is riddled with contradictions, especially when viewed in the context of Europe's progressive euthanasia policies or dismal record on human rights on their own continent reference their indifference to the Balkans.
Such large contradictions usually suggest there are other motives. Germany, along with France, has long led the anti-death penalty charge in Europe. The mayor of Paris took this viewpoint to such an extreme position that he named a city street after convicted American cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.
So it came as little surprise when a Washington Post article revealed on June 4, that the true basis for Germany's strong anti-death penalty policy was not based on morals or a sense of humanity. Instead, it was based on protecting convicted Nazi war criminals: Contrasting their nation's policy with that of the Americans, Germans point proudly to Article of their Basic Law, adopted in Communist East Germany kept the death penalty until But the actual history of the German death penalty ban casts this claim in a different light.
Article was in fact the brainchild of a right-wing politician who sympathized with convicted Nazi war criminals -- and sought to prevent their execution by British and American occupation authorities. Far from intending to repudiate the barbarism of Hitler, the author of Article wanted to make a statement about the supposed excesses of Allied victors' justice.
According to Interpol and the FBI this is not necessarily the case. If one excludes murders committed by inner city blacks from the statistics the United States actually has a lower murder rate then Germany and France.
That is not to imply that blacks are inherently evil. Their murder rates have more to do with welfare policies, racial separatism, etc. Most blacks are decent people, but a sizeable minority of them commits a disproportionate amount of crimes.
Casting this high murder rate over all sections of American society is irrational at best. It makes sense to exclude black murders to even things out because France, Germany, and the UK do not have a minority that commits 7 times per capita more murders then the rest of the country.
Otherwise, we are comparing apples to oranges. This on top of the fact that we include deaths caused by self-defense in the murder statistics.Affordable Papers is an online writing service which has helped students from the UK, US, and Europe for more than 10 years. Our great experience enables us to provide papers of the best quality.
The main secrets of our good reputation are trustful relationships with customers and talented academic writers who always create first-chop papers from scratch.
- Rehabilitation vs. Punishment Goals of Prisons In this essay I will focus on whether law offenders sent to prison should be rehabilitated, punished or both.
The purpose of this research paper will be to assess the various issues that exist in rehabilitative programs within prison systems. Basically, rehabilitation programs are used to. Public sociology is a subfield of the wider sociological discipline that emphasizes expanding the disciplinary boundaries of sociology in order to engage with non-academic audiences.
It is perhaps best understood as a style of sociology rather than a particular method, theory, or set of political values. Since the twenty-first century, the term has been widely associated with University of.
Free rehabilitation papers, essays, and research papers. Improving Patient Safety in Stroke Rehabilitation Wards - Patient safety is a major issue in health care, especially in the public sector.
The United States stands alone as the only nation that sentences people to life without parole for crimes committed before turning This briefing paper reviews the Supreme Court precedents that limited the use of JLWOP and the challenges that remain.
In addition to our online resources, there are many research tools available in the library's reading room. On-site users can access digitized primary source documents from the New-York Historical Society in Gateway to North America: The People Places, & Organizations of 19th Century New York and digitized Revolutionary War Orderly Books.